WHO TRS (Technical Report Series) 1010, 2018 Annex 9

TELUGU GMP
0

WHO TRS (Technical Report Series) 1010, 2018 Annex 9

Guidance on good practices for desk assessment of compliance with good manufacturing practices, good laboratory practices and good clinical practices for medical products regulatory decisions

Background:

In recent years both formal and informal collaboration among national regulatory authorities (NRAs) has significantly improved. This, in turn, has strengthened medicines regulatory systems, thereby improving the availability of good quality, safe and effective medical products for patients. A number of regional and supraregional groupings of NRAs are developing, which will facilitate collaboration.

During a World Health Organization (WHO) training symposium on the subject of collaborative registration procedures for national medicines regulatory authorities held in Kenya in September 2016, delegates recommended that the gap in common guidance on best practice for performing desk assessment should be filled. It was proposed that WHO, in collaboration with regulators from Member States, develop guidance that NRAs might leverage in their national regulatory practice and decision-making.

Up to now, there has been no general guidance on approaches and best practices for desk assessment. Desk assessments are conducted in order to verify and confirm compliance with good manufacturing practices (GMP), good laboratory practices (GLP) and good clinical practices (GCP) of foreign facilities for manufacture of finished pharmaceutical products (FPPs) and active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), quality control laboratories (QCLs), contract research organizations (CROs) and clinical trial sites.

Click on the following title for full details: pdf

Table of Contents

Background 

1. Introduction 

2. Aim and objectives of the guidance 

3. Scope of the guidance

4. Glossary 

5. Essential elements of desk assessment 

5.1 High-level support and cooperation

5.2 Commonality of quality management systems in inspectorates 

5.3 Convergent standards of good practices 

5.4 Reliability and accuracy of information 

5.5 Management tools to support consistent and objective assessment 

5.6 Risk-based assessment of available information 

5.7 Mutual trust and confidence among inspectorates 

5.8 Quality assurance of the desk assessment process 

5.9 Communication of assessment outcomes 

6. Sources of good information and related challenges 

6.1 Official websites with databases 

6.2 Authenticity of documents 

6.3 Failure to submit documentary evidence 

7. Submission and assessment of documentary evidence and information 

7.1 Submission of application for desk assessment and documentary evidence 

7.2 Assessment of documentary evidence and information 

7.3 General requirements for documents

8. Regulatory actions and reporting of serious instances of noncompliance

8.1 Communication and information exchange

9. Responsibilities of the applicant

References and further reading 

Appendix 1: Model report format for desk assessment for finished pharmaceutical products and active pharmaceutical ingredient manufacturers 

Appendix 2: Model report format for desk assessment of quality control laboratories 

Appendix 3: Model report format for desk assessment for contract research organizations and clinical trial sites



WHO TRS (Technical Report Series) 1010, 2018 Annex 9:
Tags

Post a Comment

0Comments

Post a Comment (0)